[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban-beginners] elidable terminator discussion in CLL?



I've added basically this note to the Suggestions for CLL, second
edition page.  Thank you for confirming it doesn't exist in the CLL.

-Alan

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:48:29AM -0500, Michael Turniansky wrote:
>    I don't believer either actually exists. The first reference to a
>    terminator being elidable is Chapter 5.5 (and here ke'e isn't associated
>    with the word "terminator"). The first use of the word terminator is in
>    5.7 with be'o. Nor is is explicitly stated anywhere (that I've seen) the
>    entire general concept that many grammatical in lojban are introduced with
>    a cmavo, and closed with a terminator that may be elided under certain
>    circumstance (Such as there being a terminator from an enclosing group,
>    which implicitly terminates all internal groups that have not been
>    terminated). It would probably be a good idea to include sucha conept in
>    the CLL in English, but I don't think it exists. Probably Computer Science
>    people such as me never noticed this lack, because it seems intuitively
>    obvious to our mindset, but yeah, it should definitely be stated somwhere.
>    (the end of Chapter 19 is as close as it comes, but yeah, basically, just
>    a list, and obviously, the general concepts should probably be introduced
>    earlier)
>    --gejyspa
> 
>    On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, .alyn.post.
>    <[1]alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> 
>      The CLL frequently uses the phrase "elidable terminator." I'm
>      looking for a place in the book where this phrase is defined,
>      and preferably also a formal statement that elidable terminators
>      bind to their closest marker:
> 
>      to to toi => (to (to toi))
>      lu lu li'u => (lu (lu li'u))
> 
>      Is true, whereas:
> 
>      to to toi => (to (to) toi)
>      lu lu li'u => (lu (lu) li'u)
> 
>      Is incorrect.
> 
>      Can someone point me to the chapter where this concept is discussed?
>      It is indirectly discussed all over the place, for specific
>      terminators, but I can't seem to find the principle described
>      anywhere.
> 
>      I'm aware of the list of elidable terminators:
> 
>      [2]http://dag.github.com/cll/19/17/
> 
>      But that page does not discuss usage or define them.
> 
>      -Alan
>      --
>      .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi
>      --
>      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>      Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
>      To post to this group, send email to
>      [3]lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
>      To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>      [4]lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>      For more options, visit this group at
>      [5]http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
> 
>    --
>    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>    "Lojban Beginners" group.
>    To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
>    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>    lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>    For more options, visit this group at
>    http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. mailto:alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org
>    2. http://dag.github.com/cll/19/17/
>    3. mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
>    4. mailto:lojban-beginners%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>    5. http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en

-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.