Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: BAI zi'o

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Thursday 24 February 2011 19:45:04 Ian Johnson wrote:
> That's inconsistent with what you said earlier. That is, if {no da}
> *really* works the same between both cases, then {lo du'u ko'a broda no da
> cu nibli lo du'u ko'a na broda} and {lo du'u ko'a broda broda TAG no da cu
> nibli lo du'u ko'a na broda} must both be true. I know the former is true;
> you said the latter is false.

{lo du'u ko'a broda TAG no da cu nibli lo du'u ko'a na broda TAG} is true. TAG 
adds an extra place to broda.

Taking a concrete example, la .uacos. tcimpazi bau lo merxanbau .ije la figan. 
tcimpazi bau noda .i la figan. na tcimpazi bau .iku'i la figan. ja'a tcimpazi

mu'omi'e .pier.
-- 
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.