Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: BAI zi'o

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

That's inconsistent with what you said earlier. That is, if {no da} *really* works the same between both cases, then {lo du'u ko'a broda no da cu nibli lo du'u ko'a na broda} and {lo du'u ko'a broda broda TAG no da cu nibli lo du'u ko'a na broda} must both be true. I know the former is true; you said the latter is false.

mu'o mi'e .latros.

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

On Thursday 24 February 2011 10:13:11 Ian Johnson wrote:
> That seems like a pretty significant irregularity to me; if {no da} fills a
> predicate place, it is as if {na} were put in, but if {no da} fills a TAG
> place, it isn't. Or is it that {broda TAG} is a new predicate which is
> false when {broda TAG no da} is true even though {broda} itself may be
> true?

"noda" works the same way whether it's in a numbered place or a tagged place.
Prepositions (including tense markers) can be negated, though, whereas FA
cannot.

Pierre
--
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.