Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda}

[Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>]

Yes, I'm finally on for a little bit. My assertion is that {ro broda} is -not- equivalent to {ro da poi broda} because {ro da} is explicitly EVERYTHING. {lo} does not have any default quantifiers under xorlo, which means that while {roda poi broda} is literally everything that brodas, {ro lo broda} or {ro broda} is all of an implicit number of brodas. {ro da poi broda} is equal to {ro lo ro broda} AFAIK.

Am I wrong on any point? Cos the xorlo article contradicts itself, and the CLL doesn't feature xorlo-related content.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.