Re: [lojban-beginners] Possession with "le le ..."

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Thursday 28 April 2011 11:59:55 Luke Bergen wrote:
> But in {lo lo blabi cu gerku} it seems like it's not behaving the same way.
>  It seems like it's not valid to read this as "take the next selbri and
> make it a sumti: (take the next selbri and make it a sumti: (blabi) <here
> comes a selbri> (gerku) )

"lo blabi cu gerku" is a sentence in which "lo blabi" is a sumti of "gerku". 
But the first "lo" expects a selbri, not a whole bridi, so "lo lo blabi cu 
gerku" is ungrammatical.

Pierre
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.