On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:I don't know on what basis you say that. I think perhaps you are
> It seems to me that {bavlamdei be fi lo ctufau} is only permissible due to
> xorlo. Is there a more precise way to fill in the "by standard x"?
>
thinking about it as a natlang speaker. Xorlo or not, when you put
something in the x3 of bavlamdei, for example, it is _by definition_
some type of manri. "lo ctufau" simply specifies what type of manri it
is -- it's a ctufau manri. I could explicitly _say_ "lo ctufau
manri", but it's not necessary, and more than it's necessary, when
pointing to a dog, to say "ta barda gerku" instead of "ta barda".
Doesn't make it any less of a dog, you're just calling out the salient
feature you want to express, that it's big. Describing a te bavlamdei
as a ctufau doesn't make it any less of a te bavlamdei.
I'm probably not expressing myself reall well, but I hope my point
is getting across. (Perhaps it would make more sense if I used a more
analgous sentence, like "mi cadzu lo clani"?)
--gejyspa
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.