[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban-beginners] Complicated parallelism question

This will work with my {me'au}:
.i ba za bo la lojban me'au lo selbri be le se go'i
Still not all that concise, but it'd be hard to make concise (even with new cmavo), because you're trying to point at constituents of a NU bridi, and those could be arbitrarily nested.

mu'o mi'e .latros.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
A long time ago, I read that loglan exists.
{.i mi pu zu tcidu cilre lo du'u la loglan zasti}

And a medium time after that, that lojban does.
{.i ba za bo la lojban co'e}

Is there a way to use something more precise than {co'e} in the second phrase without sacrificing much conciseness?
I was considering {.i ba za bo go'i lo du'u la lojban zasti}, but {pamai} I'm not sure if the {du'u} abstraction is referred to rather than the outer bridi and {remai} I still have to repeat {zasti}. {cimai} it's not very concise.

--
          Alex R

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.