[lojban-beginners] Complicated parallelism question

[Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com>]

A long time ago, I read that loglan exists.
{.i mi pu zu tcidu cilre lo du'u la loglan zasti}

And a medium time after that, that lojban does.
{.i ba za bo la lojban co'e}

Is there a way to use something more precise than {co'e} in the second phrase without sacrificing much conciseness?
I was considering {.i ba za bo go'i lo du'u la lojban zasti}, but {pamai} I'm not sure if the {du'u} abstraction is referred to rather than the outer bridi and {remai} I still have to repeat {zasti}. {cimai} it's not very concise.

--

          Alex R

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.