Re: [lojban-beginners] Argument repetition for emphasis?

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

I'd say that {lo broda be fa lo brode} == {lo broda NOI ke'a brode} is probably fair; an interesting question is which NOI it is, though. I'd be inclined to say it's actually poi, not noi.

Of course, this can change a bit when we're already talking about {lo brode}, I think, though I have a hunch that THAT thought actually is just me being malglico.

mu'o mi'e .latros.

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

That makes sense, but if I saw "lo fatci be fa lo du'u mi nakni" I would read that as something like "lo du'u mi nakni kei noi ke'a fatci".  As in "I am male (which is a [true ]fact)".

But that might just be me being malglico.

On Jan 2, 2011 2:37 PM, "Michael Turniansky" <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.