[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: ci lo gerku vs lo ci gerku

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
> No it isn't, xorxes. The empty set (which is to say {lo po'o se nomei}) is a
> thing.

Of course it is. Are you suggesting I said it wasn't?

> In fact, set theory basically works around it, putting it in sets,
> putting those sets in other sets, etc.

I didn't say that saying of something that it was a se nomei was
contradictory, I said saying it was a nomei is contradictory. The
empty set is not nomei, it is a set that has no members.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.