[lojban-beginners] Re: I'm a Believer

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 5/10/05, Betsemes <betsemes@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I knew about the abstractors. What confuses me is that /mi pu steba ro se
> senva be mi/ has no such abstractor and yet steba requires an abstraction:
> steba: x1 feels frustration about x2 (abstraction)

x2 of senva takes an abstraction, therefore {lo se senva} refers to
an abstraction.

    mi senva lo nu mi vofli

   lo nu mi vofli = lo se senva be mi

> That leads me to conclude that abstractions do not necessarily requires an
> abstractor and thus it leaves me with a vague idea of what an abstraction
> is.

xu le mupli pu sidju

mu'o mi'e xorxes