[lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban is poor for machine translation

To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban is poor for machine translation
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:36:53 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CdfPrT7tlz6CSH83kOuQsWa4YQaGb9upw8oyQDmBoJ04K98dXDVwFG5qbDxviT88TQw2YsVdo6z0Oe/eFXuEt1v2nG2Zn5kmjasMqccpydN4MCF6Vx5K1K9g9dTDMAw0llxhglRnWA7NGSwGsir6erolYsg6r+ZYq7nQWll0B54=
In-reply-to: <ee78c6ed0509060309c58a150@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ee78c6ed0509060309c58a150@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org

Lojban wasn't developed for machine translation, only for simple communication.

In general, I think a {jbofi'e}-style interpreter is enough for every AL; do we need any more?

.uanai

mi'e .xili,odor.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban is poor for machine translation
  - From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban-beginners] Lojban is poor for machine translation
  - From: Naomi K <alien.juxtaposition@gmail.com>