[lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban is poor for machine translation

[Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>]

More precisely, one of the partial reasons for which Lojban was
developed (among many other reasons of various amounts of importance)
was in the hope that it would facilitate verbal communication between
humans and computers. Not necessarily between humans and other humans
with different natural languages.
-epkat

On 9/7/05, HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com> wrote:

Lojban wasn't developed for machine translation, only for simple communication.

In general, I think a {jbofi'e}-style interpreter is enough for every AL; do we need any more?

.uanai

 

mi'e .xili,odor.