[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: "Windows Metafile Vulnerability"
Considering how much discussion in the forums of any artificial
language is _about_ the language rather than _in_ the language (and
therefore meta),
and considering how many words in the Lojban flashcards are defined as
"metalinguistic not," "metalinguistic yes," and so forth,
I am extremely surprised that a best practice for expressing the
concept of "meta" was not worked out decades ago. Here is a delicious
opportunity.
Perhaps some combination of {srana traji bartu ciste manri} would help us here.
-epkat
On 1/8/06, Tasci <lojban@synx.dyndns.org> wrote:
> * Jorge Llamb?as (jjllambias@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > A "metafile", if I understand the definitions I found, is
> > not a file but a specific graphics file format.
> I may not know lojban yet, but I can step forward for this.
>
> A metafile, in the Windows sense, is a file that can represent a
> different file, whether a graphics file format, or a binary executable
> virus. That's why people are so up in arms about WMF format, and also
> why it's so easy to write viruses for it. Purported as an image format,
> it's really more like one of those self extracting zip archives.
>
> I might also add meta was originally Greek for "after, while, or
> beyond." People since attributed it to also mean "self-referencing" as
> in "metafile" is a file of files, or "an abstraction on top of" as in
> "metaphysics" is the physics of physics itself. Does that help figure
> out what metafile is in lojban at all?
> --
> Pandora "Starling/Tasci/Antinomy/Figment/???" synx
> pgp key at http://synx.dyndns.org/starling.asc
>
>
>
>