[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] rafsi and FAhA's
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] rafsi and FAhA's
- From: c k <letsclimbhigher@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GxRSidu9JqB2U+/QtthyjsNTvvCPNEwW5LVzVKPYRk8MnpbzgXihcJSY+nmgz0f0ZXRNhZfVIS6BFom5nV/bxE2md/cWziIFsKhX1vvvMt479Z1uhnamCPk8tTX0UpCPlrYNdl2pYxkLAsK1LkMTppU/Rt7rEyHm4ncb67FTt2o= ;
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
coi rodo
I noticed that:
trixe rix ti'e FAhA ti'a
Why didn't they make the rafsi for trixe simply {ti'a}?
Here's another one:
zunle zul FAhA zu'a
pritu (no rafsi) FAhA ri'u
Why didn't they just let pritu have {ri'u} as a rafsi as well? For example, with nenri both the rafsi and FAhA are {ne'i}.
ki'e
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.