[lojban-beginners] Re: Connectives within abstractions

["Karl Naylor" <karl.org@gmail.com>]

On 12/03/07, Turniansky, Michael <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com> wrote:

> "mi djica lenu dzukla janai klama"= "I like the event of (If I go, then
> I walk)"  Which is what you want.  (I like walking everywhere)

.ui .e'e ki'e

>  Iff you put in a kei after dzukla, closing off the NU, then the "le nu
> dzukla" would be the left-hand-side of the "janai", and the "klama"
> would be the right:
> "mi djica lenu dzukla kei janai klama" => "If I go, then I like to
> walk."  Which is subtly different.  It means if you stay put, then we
> don't know if you like walking or not.

I like that even better.  Does it not require a {be} between {djica}
and {le}, though?  Or how about just "mi dzukla djica janai klama"?
Jeks don't affect binding precedence, do they?  So that would be "If I
go, then I walk-desire" .iepei?