[lojban-beginners] Re: Debug my propaganda?

["Turniansky, Michael" <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com>]

  No, jbofi'e likes it.  It was my fault for trying the second sentence in isolation, since jbofi'e had drowned on the entire utterance, and I was trying to figure out where the error lay by breaking it apart, which introduced an error that wasn't there (it was only that very last utterance that was bad).  My apologies, Karl.  (see previous comment about making myself out to be a fool).

           --gejyspa

-----Original Message-----
From: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Llambías
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 8:44 AM
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Debug my propaganda?

On 3/19/07, Turniansky, Michael <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com> wrote:
> > ---
> >.ije mi ca ka'e  casnu so'o sampu bau ly.
>
>  Ungrammatical as it stands (I like to run everything I send out
> through jbofi'e to make sure it at least passes that level of processing
> (although jbofi'e will give a false negative on some constructions, as
> it likes a bit more "ku"s than are strictly necessary).  "ije"=>".ijebo"

{.ije} by itself should be fine there. If jbofi'e requires {bo}, then that's a
bug. {bo} is required with tags used as connectives: {.i <tag> bo},
or {.i je <tag> bo}, but with {.i je} it would only be required to make
binding tighter.

mu'o mi'e xorxes