On 6/3/07, Vid Sintef <picos.picos@gmail.com> wrote:
Can there be any shorter equivalent of { le ka ce'u simsa la
arnold.cfartseneger. kei poi se ckaji mi }?
You could omit {ce'u}, since when the first place is vacant that's
where it is normally assumed to go, and also you could say
{poi mi ckaji}, thus avoiding {se}.
mu'o mi'e xorxes