[lojban-beginners] Re: la

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 6/18/07, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that without the gadri {la} the language breaks. E.g.
> { * .i klaus. pat. prami }.
> We wouldn't know whether { * klaus. pat. } was one name or two; in other
> words, this could be interpreted as (in proper Lojban)
> { .i la klaus. la pat. prami } (Klaus loves Pat) or
> { .i la klaus. pat. prami } (Klaus Pat loves [someone])

That could be solved if cmevla had the grammar of selma'o BY:
{.klaus.pat.[boi] prami} vs. {.klaus. boi .pat. [boi] prami}.

But I find a greater affinity of cmevla with BRIVLA, the two open
word classes in Lojban.

mu'o mi'e xorxes