On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Pierre Abbat <
phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 May 2010 16:22:03 Jonathan Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Two things: {lo glibau te jimpe /fi/ mi}. Oops.
>>
>> "x1 understands (fi) x3" <- Note that this is part of the official
>> definition, for cases when {lo se jimpe} is elided.
>
> {lo glibau cu te jimpe fi mi}. Without {cu}, {lo glibau te jimpe} is a tanru.
It doesn't mean however that you undersatnd something said in English.