[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban-beginners] sei vs to
tijlan wrote:
{sei} and {to}... When should we use which? What is the difference
between a discursive element and a parenthetical element?
"to" is a normal parenthetical, and can be used pretty much anywhere for
any purpose that you would use a parenthetical in English or another
language. You can talk about anything in a to parenthetical.
sei is specifically for metalinguistic discourse about the sentence or
text. So in addition to any grammatical hooks that it provides, it has
a semantic implication that to does not have. It was specifically added
to the language because of certain textual features in complex English
text that didn't have a clearly corresponding structure in Lojban, but
was later expanded to allow for on-the-fly creation of novel discursives
and attitudinals (members of UI), in the same way that fi'o is used to
allow on-the-fly creation of novel sumti tcita/modal tags (members of
BAI), from a corresponding bridi.
The original usages of sei were
a)embedded in quoted text, the identification of the speaker, and any
supplemental information included therewith ("Think Tom Swiftie
adverbs", lojbab said self-referentially, "and look at this quote for
such an English example".
(You will find the original use of sei for this purpose in Athelstan''s
1990 translation of Saki's "The Open Window", somewhere in the Lojban
texts page, which IIRC has lots of conversation as the various speakers
walk down the hall, open windows, look out through them, all expressed
in comma delimited phrases embedded within the quotes in the English
original.)
b) The translation of self-referential paradoxes, of the "This sentence
is false" variety, non-paradoxically by jumping to a new metalinguistics
level inside the sei construct.
dei jetnu sei jitfa
The times when you need a se'u more or less correspond to the times when
you need a fe'u on the end of a fi'o - generally if you've opened a
complex multilevel structure inside the construct that you wish to make
sure is terminated so it doesn't suck up something accidentally from the
main bridi level. This most commonly occurs when there are abstraction
sumti in the construct. You can probably end these with kei, but to be
sure, use se'u/fe'u.
lojbab
--
Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org
President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.