why not just use {ckusro} (which already exists in jbovlaste) and {ponse}. {le mi ckule ckusro cu na'e ponse la <a particular book>}Or {ckule be fo mi be'o na ckusro be la <a particular book>} -> [something] is a school of me type of [NOT] library with book <a particular book>.The second example there seems clunky to me. I think the base relationship is {ponse} or something like it.--On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
--I attempted to say something along the lines of:
My university's library does not have <a particular book>.
preferably without having to use {pe}. My attempt was using a somewhat long lujvo, seljitckusro, which I defined as:
x1 is a library containing books x2 managed by x3.
(The underlying tanru was {se jitro ke cukta sorcu}.)
and then the construction (with the book being the last sumti of the previous sentence) was:
.i ri na se seljitckusro fi lo balcu'e be fo mi
Does this seem reasonable? I don't have much practice coining lujvo but am attempting to get better at it.
mu'o mi'e latros.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.