Re: [lojban-beginners] Adding to Pro-bridi

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ross Ogilvie <oges007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey
>
> The initial question I was thinking about this afternoon was: is { mo mo } a
> grammatically bridi. But it went on to be more general than that. Can
> pro-bridi (and other things like them) be combined with each other and
> brivla into tanru?
>
> eg
> { ko klama .i sutra go'i } - Go! Quickly!
>
> If this is the case, I've seen forms like { na go'i }, so I know that you
> can add tenses to these things. But when you say { na melbi .i na go'i } the
> second bridi has the same meaning as the first, with the second { na }
> 'overwriting' the first. (I recall reading this, but couldn't find where
> when I quickly checked the obvious places).

  CLL chapter 15, section 9, after example 9.4

>  So then do tanru based around
> pro-bridi follow the same principle
>
> eg
> { mi sutra cliva .i masno go'i } = { mi sutra cliva .i mi masno cliva } or {
> mi sutra cliva .i masno sutra cliva } or something else?
>

  Na is not a brivla, so it is specially defined ,if you will.... Your
example would lead to "i masno sutra cliva".
         --gejyspa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.