On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ross Ogilvie <
oges007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey
>
> The initial question I was thinking about this afternoon was: is { mo mo } a
> grammatically bridi. But it went on to be more general than that. Can
> pro-bridi (and other things like them) be combined with each other and
> brivla into tanru?
>
> eg
> { ko klama .i sutra go'i } - Go! Quickly!
>
> If this is the case, I've seen forms like { na go'i }, so I know that you
> can add tenses to these things. But when you say { na melbi .i na go'i } the
> second bridi has the same meaning as the first, with the second { na }
> 'overwriting' the first. (I recall reading this, but couldn't find where
> when I quickly checked the obvious places).
CLL chapter 15, section 9, after example 9.4