[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] ka versus du'u



In a message dated 9/19/2002 1:04:49 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

<<
One way it can be done is with subscripts:

        le ka ce'uxipa ce'uxire zo'u broda fa ce'uxipa
        ce'uxire ce'uxire ce'uxipa

Another way is with goi:

        le ka ce'u goi ko'a ce'u goi ko'e zo'u broda fa
        ko'a ko'e ko'e ko'a

>>
As I said, it can be done, but it is not tidy the way that {da, de, di} is (though, of course, these have to go to subscripts eventually as well) -- nor nearly as clear, either to the eye or the understanding.  I'm not sure what the ideal solution would be (I personally like taking {ce'u} as lambda and using the regular variables) or even a practical one, but if we are going to do much more of this lambdaing, we need somthing, just to make usuable example.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.