[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Sets and classes

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Sets and classes
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:08 -0700
In-reply-to: <02092120101005.02144@neofelis>
Mail-followup-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <02092120101005.02144@neofelis>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:10:10PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> In mathematical usage, "class" is {klesi} (or maybe {zilkle} since x2
> is always sets) and "set" appears to be {selcmi}. But what of the
> empty set? {} selcmi noda, and {selcmi noda} is equivalent to {na
> selcmi}. So what is the word for "set"?

What makes you think that selcmi noda == na selcmi?  And what about lo
selcmi poi kunti?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP 				http://www.lojban.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
  - From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>

References:
- Sets and classes
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>

Prev by Date: Sets and classes
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] tu'o usage
Previous by thread: Sets and classes
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread