[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] tu'o usage



In a message dated 9/21/2002 12:31:26 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

<<
There never was a difference between {pa lo su'o} and {pa lo ro},
so "any more" does not apply.

>>
True, only one thought to hold between {lo ro} and {lo su'o}.

<<
There is a difference between {ro lo su'o} and {ro lo ro} under
nonimporting {ro}, but this has not come up in the present
discussion.

{ro lo ro pavyseljirna cu blabi} is true (in worlds with no unicorns)
with nonimporting {ro}, but false with importing {ro}.

{ro lo su'o pavyseljirna cu blabi} is false (in worlds with no
unicorns) both for importing and nonimporting {ro}.
>>
It hasn't come up because, as you well know after hammering away at it, there is now no non-importing {ro} (though I cannot remember what the corresponding nonimporting expression is, it never being one I need).    So {ro lo ro pavyseljirna cu blabi} is just false  in this world (and its denial probably is too).  And the same goes for {ro lo su'o pavyseljirna cu blabi}.


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.