In a message dated 9/21/2002 12:31:26 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: << There never was a difference between {pa lo su'o} and {pa lo ro}, >> True, only one thought to hold between {lo ro} and {lo su'o}. << There is a difference between {ro lo su'o} and {ro lo ro} under nonimporting {ro}, but this has not come up in the present discussion. {ro lo ro pavyseljirna cu blabi} is true (in worlds with no unicorns) with nonimporting {ro}, but false with importing {ro}. {ro lo su'o pavyseljirna cu blabi} is false (in worlds with no unicorns) both for importing and nonimporting {ro}. >> It hasn't come up because, as you well know after hammering away at it, there is now no non-importing {ro} (though I cannot remember what the corresponding nonimporting expression is, it never being one I need). So {ro lo ro pavyseljirna cu blabi} is just false in this world (and its denial probably is too). And the same goes for {ro lo su'o pavyseljirna cu blabi}.
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. |