In a message dated 10/11/2002 6:12:03 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes: << How come {kei} has a rafsi (kez)?>> Is the question Why this particular form of rafsi? or Why a rafsi for kei at all? I suppose the answer to the first is"because it doesn't interfere with anything else yet is close to the full form." I haven't a clue about the second, since I can't imagine actually using it in a lujvo --even if {kei} were used in the underlying tanru.
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. |