On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 12:12:47AM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> Jordan:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:50:56AM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> > > Lojbab:
> > > > You and And seem to be the primary innovators who KNOW that you are
> > > > acting against the baseline.
> > >
> > > That's probably true, but I don't think much of my activity is contrary
> > > to the baseline. There is universal agreement that CLL is wrong in places
> > > (or near-universal agreement, I had better say, now that Jordan has
> > > joined the community), so either mere deviance from CLL is not necessarily
> > > acting against the baseline, or else there is universal agreement to
> > > act against the baseline.
> > [...]
> >
> > For the record this doesn't reflect my viewpoint.
>
> Which bit doesn't?
The claim that I believe CLL is correct about everything.
What I *actually* believe, is that it is correct in everything that it
doesn't contradict itself or other baselined material.
[...]
> xorxes's ji'i is a relative extreme case of deviance. (If I were xorxes
> I'd use experimental cmavo instead of deviantly reusing cmavo I thought
> broken.)
I commend you for that. Experimental cmavo are *far* preferable
to deliberatly breaking baselined stuff. (Though true stability would
be preferable to either, of course. ;P )
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00180.pgp
Description: PGP signature