On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 04:59:24PM -0000, oskar2379 wrote:
[...]
> > It *could* be expressed as a lujvo. For that matter, "mamta" could
> be
> > expressed as a lujvo too. The gismu are not intended to be a
> minimal
> > basis set.
>
> You're right, mamta should be parent-female :)
> Maybe that will be the first thing I try to do...split gismu up. It
> will take a while but I'm only 16 so I have a lot of time.
[...]
I don't think mamta requires x1 to be a female. It just has to be
someone who is acting maternally to x2 (the entry specifically says
it is not just about biological relationships).
So perhaps parent-female (fetsyrirni) is a useful predicate; but I
don't think it is the same as mamta.
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00475.pgp
Description: PGP signature