Re: [lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed.

[Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

At 04:55 PM 9/16/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:35:00PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:22, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:18:02AM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> > > > then those resolutions would be rather conspicuously
> > > > unconservative, it seems. I'd have thought that it would have
> > > > been enough for Robin to ask for active commissioners with an
> > > > avowed aversion to tinkering,
> > >
> > > That would be fine, yes.
> >
> > Well, I wouldn't say *avowed*, but I rather dislike tinkering,
> > unless it's to clarify something which was a little muddy (gadri,
> > for example).
>
> Bob, I hope you read that.

How do you expect me to react to it?  I'm pretty aware of the range of 
opinions among the commissioners.

If there is an issue to be decided, then it needs to go to the Board.  It 
isn't clear what people would want to be decided.

Note that Nora and I will be contributing at most minimally to the byfy 
until the accounting turnover is complete, as was decided before the byfy 
started.  That is one reason for my inactivity.  The other, as probably is 
true for others in the community, is that I have not yet recovered from the 
stress levels associated with the annual meeting enough to even *want* to 
increase my Lojban activity level.

lojbab

--
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org