[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:56:42PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > Basically, Y is caught anywhere that *any* Lojban word would
> > normally be valid, so it can be used in ZEI, BU, ZOI, and ZO.
> > Probably some others. As an *extra* special case, it cannot have
> > BAhE applied to it, because that would just be silly.
>
> Why not restrict it to {ybu} only, then, since it is also silly with
> the other words. You could actually be hesitating, and then you have
> to start erasing y's, which is very silly.
What about 'zo y'?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi
- Prev by Date:
Re: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI
- Next by Date:
Re: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI
- Previous by thread:
Re: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI
- Next by thread:
Re: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI
- Index(es):