Re: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 03:25:06PM +0100, Zefram wrote:
> Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> >If "y" is a word, it should be quotable with "zo", lerfuable with
> >"bu", lujvoable with "zei", erasable with "si" and emphasizable with
> >"ba'e", like any other word.
> 
> Is "si" a word?  

Of course.

> It satisfies some of these criteria but not all. 

Really?  Which of those criteria does it not satisfy?

The only one that I can see that it doesn't satisfy is not being
erasable with 'si', which is transparently circular.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi