In a message dated 4/17/2001 5:08:18 AM Central Daylight Time,
Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de writes: I came across to express the idea of "not only" in Lojban and am not too This looks like an acute attack of leka malglico (well, malSAE, given "non solo sed etiam" from Latin I). In the language of logic (and so, presumably, in the logical language) "not only Ss are Ps" is "not all Ps are Ss". The "but also Qs are Ps" is just "and [some] Qs are P's " (with or without an "in addition" thrown in). nake ro lo se citka be lo ratcu cu cirla .ije ra [=lo ratcu] cu citkalo rectu [ji'a] nake ro lo citka be lo rectu cu ratcu .ije le mlatu [ji'a] cu citka lo rectu |