[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: zi'o and modals



In a message dated 6/10/2001 5:53:33 PM Central Daylight Time,
jay.kominek@colorado.edu writes:



: mi klama      ; I go
> b: go'i bai ma   ; Compelled by what?
> a: zi'o          ; Nonexistent, doesn't apply
> b: je'e          ; roger.

Shouldn't a respond with noda, not zi'o?




Yes, for the most part.  The whole idea of modal+{zi'o} is kinda odd,since
{zi'o} is there to incapacitate an essential part of a relation.  So why add
a new factor and then cut it off?  The {zi'o} answer above might makethat
point over and above {noda}.