Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/13/2001 12:39:20 AM Central Daylight Time,
ragnarok@pobox.com writes:

E. An attitudinal attached to a sumti does not assert the sentence to be
true IF the attitudinal is not:

Attitudinals DO NOT ASSERT anything, so cannot be true or false.  This "rule"
does not make sense.  

<F. An attitudinal attached to the selbri implies that the bridi is true but
doesn't actually assert it.>
Since attitudinals don't assert anyhting, they don't strictly imply anything
either (maybe only a terminological problem?)

And so on.  This seem essentially to do away with attitudinals as such and
replace them with only assertions about my mental states.