[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals



In a message dated 6/13/2001 11:22:50 AM Central Daylight Time,
rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


Here's what I think each VV attitudinal means at the beginning of a sentence.

I haven't checked this list carefully, but I want to put in a warning about
this enterprise.  So far as I can tell, even the revised attitudinal
proposals do not turn bridi with attitudinals attached into asasertions about
my attitudes, as these sentence fragments seem to do.  It continues, even if
the factive-fictive division comes to hold across the board, to be important
to distinguish between expressing an attitude and claiming to have one.  If
the attitudinals in some position or other are claim makers, then I -- and I
hope every other careful Lojbanist -- will oppose *that* plan.