[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Retraction, Part 1
At 07:28 PM 8/21/01 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Nick NICHOLAS wrote:
So that I understand this, there is a real possibility that it will take
years rather than months for the content of the lessons to be reviewed and
finalised. Yes?
Alas, it is not inconceivable. In a sense, there is no point in
officially freezing them until we can afford to print-publish
them.
I will note however, that there is no reason why, when the editor so
decides, the lessons cannot be Web published, even if LLG cannot afford to
print-publish at that point. It then becomes up to the editor or the Board
if he declines to decide, whether to make any revisions at some later point
when we have the money.
If I document the standard, the standard is inconsistent (but leans
towards the latter.)
IMAO when the Book contradicts itself, the Book is in error,
period.
The Author speaks, and is the ultimate Authority %^)
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org