| In a message dated 8/24/2001 11:20:08 AM Central Daylight Time,
arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes: OTOH, there is no alternative way of expressing current {me}, which Well, I have to admit that those cases, with name/titles rather than decriptors are pretty convincing. Except, of course, that they fall under the original {me}, without any significant extension -- and even save a {la'o} . I am unsure what intensionalizing a name means or making it into a property, different from being identical with the bearer of the name. Still, how do I say "mine"? |