Re: [lojban] A serious but ungeneralized new attempt on Q-kau

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 9/6/2001 7:58:08 PM Central Daylight Time,
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:

No, for two reasons. First of all, you need "poi ge jetnu gi du'u
da prami de" to be a restriction on da and on de, but it isn't. As
it stands, you're claiming that ko'a knows that everything loves
everything. IIRC, though, there is a way to get one relative clause to
modify two conjoined sumti, but I can't remember offhand how to do it.

Not "every one loves everyone" even, the quantifiers are outside the the
{du'u}
-- unless of course, everyone DOES love everyone, in which case all those
props are true.