Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 11/3/2001 9:38:51 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:

a proper
well-behaved quantifier-bound variable is not pointless, and it is
good for us to have such a thing, even if it can't be da & we have to
have an experimental cmavo for it instead.

Well, {da} is proper and well-behaved; its user are sometimes not.  We let them get away with it colloquially, but call them to heel when precision is an issue.