Re: ka'e (was: Re: [lojban] Introduction, and zutse/se sutse

[And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>]

>>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 11/14/01 05:21pm >>>
#On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
#> 2. The "innately capable of" is open to the objection raised by Jorge --
#> that it wrongly privileges one sumti.
#
#Not so fast. Which sumti is wrongly privileged in "ka'e klama da"?

The goer. I assume on the basis of canonical examples that it is the
goer that is innately capable of going somewhere.

--And.