Re: ka'e (was: Re: [lojban] Introduction, and zutse/se sutse

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> >>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 11/14/01 05:21pm >>>
> #On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
> #> 2. The "innately capable of" is open to the objection raised by Jorge --
> #> that it wrongly privileges one sumti.
> #
> #Not so fast. Which sumti is wrongly privileged in "ka'e klama da"?
>
> The goer. I assume on the basis of canonical examples that it is the
> goer that is innately capable of going somewhere.



.ienai .i le selkla po'o cu selsnu .i ku'i le mulno ckini cu cumki

.i ko lanli "mi pu klama" .i le mulno ckini cu purci



-- 
I hope they confuse the two and toss away the lit flare while holding
the lit dynamite stick as a statue of Liberty Torch. That would make my
day- for at least a 1/4 hour. -- Fernando