[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:46:11 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0201171225380.20548-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0201171225380.20548-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Reply-to: phma@webjockey.net
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com

> Requiring clipboard isn't "easy"; a standard key combination is easy. Does
> kcharselect come standard in KDE? Fiddling with xkeymaps (and only being
> able to work from your own, customized machine) isn't easy either. These
> are simple things that the chaos of open source will never provide.

In KDE 1: kikbd
In KDE 2: kxkb

mi pilno la dvorjak joi le lertcita .i sepi'o le xebro batkymo'a mi mrilu le 
xebro la .aDAM.

mu'omi'e pier.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

References:
- Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

Prev by Date: Re: timezones for talking (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?)
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] le ticrai since
Previous by thread: Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
Next by thread: Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread