[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:11:14 -0800
In-reply-to: <0201171246110M.01718@neofelis>
Mail-followup-to: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0201171225380.20548-100000@reva.sixgirls.org> <0201171246110M.01718@neofelis>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:46:11PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > Requiring clipboard isn't "easy"; a standard key combination is
> > easy. Does kcharselect come standard in KDE? Fiddling with xkeymaps
> > (and only being able to work from your own, customized machine)
> > isn't easy either. These are simple things that the chaos of open
> > source will never provide.
> 
> In KDE 1: kikbd
> In KDE 2: kxkb
> 
> mi pilno la dvorjak joi le lertcita 

.i .ue .ui mi pilno la dvorjak joinai le lertcita

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/

References:
- Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>

Prev by Date: Re: timezones for talking (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?)
Next by Date: Re: timezones for talking (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?)
Previous by thread: Re: umlauts (was: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?))
Next by thread: Re: timezones for talking and speling (was Re: [lojban] on the fone?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread