In a message dated 2/16/2002 4:53:58 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:Yes, {mu'ei} suggests "possibilities" the same way that {roi} I assume they are all at least events, which is a class we are stuck with in any case (remember that all events exist even if they do not hold). I assume that {mu'ei} as a tag takes {le nu}. In any case, this is getting away from being about possible worlds to being about conditions, which seems the right way to go. <To me {ba} does not suggest a multiplicity of futures but only the one that gets realized, so I could never get to an alternate present using {puba}.> Yes, people differ on that a lot: some see it one way, some the other, and some somewhere in between as a totally deterministic system (time might branch but doesn't). The branching is built into SAE, but can be resisted locally. |