In a message dated 3/5/2002 7:32:15 PM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes:So to say that fancu1 "is a function" is meaningless. It can only be the Back to an earlier problem about what {sumti} ir {fancu1} refers to, the text that fills tht slot in a sentence or the object that fits in that place in a relation in the state of affairs picked by a proposition. I suspect this problem is still back of most of this arguments (and probably a few others) as it was in the beginning. And, of course, the fact that, to talk about such things, we have to go up yet another level just makes matters worse. |