[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: x2 of klesi
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: x2 of klesi
- From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:33:19 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rrm/VuCgYCEM04B+8QAw+M2sB5enS77OigoC4AY12GHMd96D28qMeQxaVI2Q3YIYScUXbTgkD5opJZV/HtOpqoMWiG/D4Vr858oWEQWp31OAI+hQCTuI1t91HSZL8FFhQpgLi2cCtawUEGFAZYD/4XgF6IsPi1yrqTOTFX03xr8= ;
- In-reply-to: <20060320232412.N71718@mail.sksys.net>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
Well, xorxes doesn't want to get involved in yet
another {lo} discussion, and this will lead into
that almost surely. But, assuming there is beer
and alcohol (and a few other assumptions), I
don't see why this won't work: "Beer is a kind
of alcohol."
--- Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, John E Clifford wrote:
>
> >> What kind of sumti can fill x2 place of
> {klesi}?
>
> > Well it's tempting to read the palces of
> {klesi}
> > as genus, species and differens, but that is
> not
> > absolutely required: x1 might be definable
> > segment of any plurality or mass (in the usal
> > sense, not the Lojbanic).
>
> So is it legal to say {lo birje cu klesi lo
> xalka}?
>
> The question is in fact about {lo}, not about
> {klesi}.
>
> --
> Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
> lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to
> http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to
> secretary@lojban.org for help.
>
>