[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: sumti with relative clause



On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Adam COOPER wrote:
On 3/21/06, Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net> wrote:

coi rodo

Playing jboselkei, I was to comment the translation containing {ro
nae'bo la djil noi zutse}. I am in doubt whether {noi zutse} applies
only to {la djil} (as author of translation assumes) or to the whole
sumti {ro na'ebo la djil} (as I guess)? Jbofi'e output is opaque.

Which version is correct?


jboski says

[1(2*ro* *every* *(of)* (3*na'e* *not* *bo* * * (4(5*la* * * *djil.*
*[NAME] *)5 <6*noi* *,which..,* [7«8*zutse* *sit-ing*»8]7>6)4)3)2]1

So {noi zutse} modifies only {la djil}

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

Official (DOS) parser agrees:

{<ro BOI> <[na'e bo] [(la djil) (noi {zutse VAU} KU'O)] LU'U>} VAU

so --> [(la djil) (noi {zutse VAU} KU'O)]

mu'omi'e .aleks.