[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
From: "Matt Arnold" <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:27:08 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cxvgGtLyg+ZFIpHAxeiSFRKMEONUhVqtwRnnFS9HB1efLm3pG25eTPahDqjxPPo0t23K589T53AH8+JJaBSlbprHNhhCUorJtVPPhLSITFoUpfWM3xJJaK0j1kremp4+/EXVR7b/682iPS3xldHzTpA31IIkCDhKRM8XIW6+rsI=
In-reply-to: <200603221115.38252.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <06bc01c64dc3$3be85080$a0d2400a@caroe1> <200603221115.38252.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

On 3/22/06, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

> I also didn't think that a past tense tag was necessary because of the {ca
> le cabycerni} tense sumti. Am I wrong?

It isn't necessary. It isn't necessary even without it; tense is optional in
Lojban.

Tense is optional in texts written originally in Lojban, but the English to be translated was asking for it.
-epkat

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
  - From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
  - From: "Betsemes" <betsemes@gmail.com>

References:
- A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
  - From: "Betsemes" <betsemes@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread